deposing power造句

例句与造句

1. It triggered the Catholic Roger Widdrington's opposition to the unconditional acceptance by Catholics of the deposing power.
2. The Oath of Allegiance ( 1606 ) formulated for James I of England contained a specific denial of the deposing power.
3. The matter moved into the public sphere, with Bellarmine's letter being thrown back as material to the pretensions of the papal deposing power.
4. Widdrington instead used the language of probabilism from moral theology, claiming that the deposing power was only a'probable'doctrine, not a matter of faith.
5. Bellarmine's " Tractatus de potestate summi pontificis in temporalibus " reiterated, against Bodin's sovereignty theory, an indirect form of the traditional papal deposing power to release subjects from the duty of obedience to tyrants.
6. It's difficult to find deposing power in a sentence. 用deposing power造句挺难的
7. Towards the end of the year 1788, Ultramontane principles, and in particular their accredited belief in the deposing power of the pope, were the chief obstacles in their way, drew out a " Protestation " disclaiming these in unmeasured language.
8. The oath declared that the " damnable doctrine " of the deposing power was " impious and heretical ", and it was condemned by Pope Paul V, 22 September 1606, " as containing many things contrary to the Faith and Salvation ".
9. A critic of Machiavelli and not a Gallican, he drew on both Jean Bodin and Fran鏾is Hotman, for an eclectic moderate Catholic position supporting the papal deposing power restricted to the Holy Roman Emperor, and the publication in France of the Tridentine decrees.
10. The 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia's article on English Post-Reformation Oaths states'In later days some people might think [ the deposing power ] out of date, inapplicable, extinct, perhaps even a mistake'and that by the time of James I of England,'[ T ] he discipline of papal deposition for extreme case of misgovernment . . . would never be in vogue again, even in Catholic countries .'
11. In 1860 Henry Edward Manning, who later became Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster and a Cardinal, wrote, " That vast chimera at which the English people especially stand in awe, the deposing power of the Pope, what was it but that supreme arbitration whereby the highest power in the world, the Vicar of the Incarnate Son of God, anointed to be high priest, to be the supreme temporal ruler, sat in his tribunal, impartially to judge between nation and nation, between people and prince, between sovereign and subject; and that deposing power grew up by the providential action of God in the world, and it taught subjects obedience, and princes clemency . ".
12. In 1860 Henry Edward Manning, who later became Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster and a Cardinal, wrote, " That vast chimera at which the English people especially stand in awe, the deposing power of the Pope, what was it but that supreme arbitration whereby the highest power in the world, the Vicar of the Incarnate Son of God, anointed to be high priest, to be the supreme temporal ruler, sat in his tribunal, impartially to judge between nation and nation, between people and prince, between sovereign and subject; and that deposing power grew up by the providential action of God in the world, and it taught subjects obedience, and princes clemency . ".
13. The issue of The Tablet ( owned by the future Cardinal Vaughan ) for 5 December 1874 stated " It is true that St . PETER never used the deposing power, but that was because Christendom had not yet begun to exist; it is equally true that neither Pius IX ., nor any of his successors, are ever likely to use it, but that is because Christendom has ceased to exist . . . But if Christendom should ever be restored, which does not seem likely, we profess our unhesitating conviction that the deposing power of GOD'S Vicar would revive with it . " The issue of the same publication for 12 December 1874 contained a letter from Charles Langdale ( born 1822 ) stating'In common with many of my contemporaries I have, more than once, taken the Catholic oath, a portion of which runs as follows :  " And I do further declare that it is not an article of my Faith . . . that Princes excommunicated or deprived by the Pope, or any other authority of the See of Rome, may be deposed or murdered by their subjects, or by any person whatsoever; and I do declare that I do not believe the Pope of Rome . . . hath, or ought to have, any temporal or civil jurisdiction, power, superiority, or preeminence, directly or indirectly, within this realm . . . . " I cannot, therefore, agree with the writer of the article in question, when he says, " we ( Catholics ) firmly believe that the Deposing Power . . . is manifestly included among the gifts of Peter . "'In the issue of the same publication for 19 December 1874,'The Writer of the Article'wrote :'Mr . Langdale " regrets " my observations on the Deposing Power because he and others have taken an oath that they do not believe it.
14. The issue of The Tablet ( owned by the future Cardinal Vaughan ) for 5 December 1874 stated " It is true that St . PETER never used the deposing power, but that was because Christendom had not yet begun to exist; it is equally true that neither Pius IX ., nor any of his successors, are ever likely to use it, but that is because Christendom has ceased to exist . . . But if Christendom should ever be restored, which does not seem likely, we profess our unhesitating conviction that the deposing power of GOD'S Vicar would revive with it . " The issue of the same publication for 12 December 1874 contained a letter from Charles Langdale ( born 1822 ) stating'In common with many of my contemporaries I have, more than once, taken the Catholic oath, a portion of which runs as follows :  " And I do further declare that it is not an article of my Faith . . . that Princes excommunicated or deprived by the Pope, or any other authority of the See of Rome, may be deposed or murdered by their subjects, or by any person whatsoever; and I do declare that I do not believe the Pope of Rome . . . hath, or ought to have, any temporal or civil jurisdiction, power, superiority, or preeminence, directly or indirectly, within this realm . . . . " I cannot, therefore, agree with the writer of the article in question, when he says, " we ( Catholics ) firmly believe that the Deposing Power . . . is manifestly included among the gifts of Peter . "'In the issue of the same publication for 19 December 1874,'The Writer of the Article'wrote :'Mr . Langdale " regrets " my observations on the Deposing Power because he and others have taken an oath that they do not believe it.
15. The issue of The Tablet ( owned by the future Cardinal Vaughan ) for 5 December 1874 stated " It is true that St . PETER never used the deposing power, but that was because Christendom had not yet begun to exist; it is equally true that neither Pius IX ., nor any of his successors, are ever likely to use it, but that is because Christendom has ceased to exist . . . But if Christendom should ever be restored, which does not seem likely, we profess our unhesitating conviction that the deposing power of GOD'S Vicar would revive with it . " The issue of the same publication for 12 December 1874 contained a letter from Charles Langdale ( born 1822 ) stating'In common with many of my contemporaries I have, more than once, taken the Catholic oath, a portion of which runs as follows :  " And I do further declare that it is not an article of my Faith . . . that Princes excommunicated or deprived by the Pope, or any other authority of the See of Rome, may be deposed or murdered by their subjects, or by any person whatsoever; and I do declare that I do not believe the Pope of Rome . . . hath, or ought to have, any temporal or civil jurisdiction, power, superiority, or preeminence, directly or indirectly, within this realm . . . . " I cannot, therefore, agree with the writer of the article in question, when he says, " we ( Catholics ) firmly believe that the Deposing Power . . . is manifestly included among the gifts of Peter . "'In the issue of the same publication for 19 December 1874,'The Writer of the Article'wrote :'Mr . Langdale " regrets " my observations on the Deposing Power because he and others have taken an oath that they do not believe it.
16. The issue of The Tablet ( owned by the future Cardinal Vaughan ) for 5 December 1874 stated " It is true that St . PETER never used the deposing power, but that was because Christendom had not yet begun to exist; it is equally true that neither Pius IX ., nor any of his successors, are ever likely to use it, but that is because Christendom has ceased to exist . . . But if Christendom should ever be restored, which does not seem likely, we profess our unhesitating conviction that the deposing power of GOD'S Vicar would revive with it . " The issue of the same publication for 12 December 1874 contained a letter from Charles Langdale ( born 1822 ) stating'In common with many of my contemporaries I have, more than once, taken the Catholic oath, a portion of which runs as follows :  " And I do further declare that it is not an article of my Faith . . . that Princes excommunicated or deprived by the Pope, or any other authority of the See of Rome, may be deposed or murdered by their subjects, or by any person whatsoever; and I do declare that I do not believe the Pope of Rome . . . hath, or ought to have, any temporal or civil jurisdiction, power, superiority, or preeminence, directly or indirectly, within this realm . . . . " I cannot, therefore, agree with the writer of the article in question, when he says, " we ( Catholics ) firmly believe that the Deposing Power . . . is manifestly included among the gifts of Peter . "'In the issue of the same publication for 19 December 1874,'The Writer of the Article'wrote :'Mr . Langdale " regrets " my observations on the Deposing Power because he and others have taken an oath that they do not believe it.